Petitioner is permitted to seek second expert opinion from independent agency, such as Central Forensic Science Laboratory (CFSL) on specific queries, which can be formulated by petitioner with help of expert of his choice.
Respondent-Authorities are directed to regularize services of all petitioners on their respective posts with effect from their respective initial dates of joining in service, with consequential benefits.
Decision to suspend Managing Director was made by a panel of Administrators, not the Board of Co-operative Societies, as it was based solely on directions from the Registrar of Co-operative Societies hence, it needs to be set aside.
Deductions made by Respondent No. 3 from death gratuity of deceased employee were justified due to a statutory undertaking given by employee, which acknowledged that any excess payments would be adjusted against future benefits.
Appellant has been rightly convicted by Sessions Court hence, impugned order of conviction of Appellant, uphold.
In context of Review Applications, differing interpretations of legal clauses do not constitute an apparent error warranting review and merely presence of two possible interpretations does not justify a reassessment of earlier decisions.
Grant of anticipatory bail is very extraordinary remedy and said power is not to be used in regular course hence, ad-interim protection granted to Applicant stands vacated forthwith.
Redevelopment by Respondent Nos. 5 to 7 obtained all necessary permissions without any evidence of false documentation hence, petition dismissed due to absence of merit, emphasizing need for transparency from State Authorities in their decision-making process.
Petitioner cannot claim continuation of her right to be Councillor in view of Scrutiny Committee invalidating her Caste Certificate.
All cases involving BA/1832, BA/5169, BA/4341, and BA/1221 saw prolonged imprisonment over four years leading to a potential violation of right to a speedy trial; thus, those applicants may be released on bail with conditions.
Respondent No.1-Vasai Virar Municipal Corporation directed to absorb and regularize petitioners by conferring them permanency on posts held by them on contractual basis.
Order taking cognizance and order issuing process, both are without application of mind, deserve to be set aside and initiation and continuation of impugned proceedings in absence of ingredients of offence amounts to an abuse of process of law.
Despite some consensual adjournments, Applicant was not represented when Order was passed, case dates back to 2014 and Court found no validity in Applicants request to recall Order, deeming it justified based on proceedings and facts reviewed.
No intentional threats or conduct amounting to extortion under Section 385 of Indian Penal Code, as simply demanding a disproportionate amount does not fulfill the required legal criteria hence, impugned FIR registered of alleged offences quashed.
Pay and recover principle, applies even for gratuitous passengers, as individuals involved were not fare-paying passengers.
Trial Court found that absence of response from Petitioner supported eviction order, concluding that there was no reason to dispute claims made by Respondent-MIDC hence, no fault could be found with impugned judgment and also eviction proceedings as carried out by Respondent-MIDC.
Impugned communication issued by Respondent No.4, thereby reducing pay scale of Petitioners and initiating recovery of amount already paid to them is quashed and Respondent Nos.1 to 4 directed to give CAS benefits to services of Petitioners from date of their first appointments.
Evidence against Appellant was deemed sufficient to establish guilt, as circumstantial evidence was consistent and did not suggest innocence hence, impugned order of conviction needs to be held.
Petitioner has used four attempts for first year MBBS and cannot be granted an additional attempt in Anatomy due to provisions of Regulation 21 of 2023 Regulations.
Admission process must remain fair to protect interests of genuinely eligible candidates and any wrongdoing must be addressed at all institutional levels and Institute is expected to conduct an independent and impartial examination of admission process.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer