Digi - Legal Insights
RENT CONTROL
Details
When Appeal Court, upon reviewing available evidence, has reached a probable finding in impugned Judgment, no interference is required in limited revisional jurisdiction of Court.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Impugned order passed by Respondent No. 2 disqualifying Petitioner as elected member and Sarpanch of Village Panchayat is erroneous and is thus quashed and set aside.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Competent Authority of SRA is directed to finalize Annexure- II in respect of slum scheme in respect of land.
EDUCATION
Details
Authorized amount will be disbursed within two weeks after determination and if Petitioner is deemed ineligible for reimbursement, reasoned decision will be issued, allowing Petitioner to seek legal remedy.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Defendants Interim Application No.3243 of 2025 is successful, concluding that Suit ought to have been filed only after obtaining permission of Charity Commissioner under Sections 50 and 51 of Act.
EDUCATION
Details
Denying admission based on technical reasons would be unjust hence, Respondent No.1 directed for creation of Supernumerary seat for admission Undergraduate Technical Course in Engineering and Technology for securing Petitioners admission.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Eviction order contradicts Acts intent and lacks consideration of harassment or neglect, leading to conclusion that both eviction and appellate orders are unsustainable.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Petitioner proved her caste claim as "Tokre Koli, Scheduled Tribe" using documentary evidence from pre and post-Independence eras, leading the Committee to issue her a validity certificate.
RENT CONTROL
Details
Impugned order directing Appellant-Licensee to pay damages at double the rate of license the fee or charge of premises fixed under agreement of license, held proper.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Delay in compensation payments, amounting to over three decades, weakens any arguments regarding delay and laches hence, Respondents ought to initiate process for acquisition of piece of land to determine and pay compensation to Petitioners under Act.
MOTOR ACCIDENT COMPENSATION
Details
Insurance Company directed to pay enhanced compensation of Rs.88,000/- to parents along with interest @ 7.5% per annum.
MOTOR ACCIDENT COMPENSATION
Details
There is no straitjacket formula for holding a persons notional income and it must be applied judiciously considering notifications from government authorities defining minimum wages.
MOTOR ACCIDENT COMPENSATION
Details
If vehicle has been sold to an innocent buyer who has paid necessary customs duties, registration must be maintained under Section 40 of Act to protect buyer from repercussions of fraud.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Impugned order rejecting application under Section 28-A of Act for want of certified copy and also holding barred by limitation set aside and matter remitted back to Respondent No.2 to decide application under Section 28A of Act.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Petitioners lacked compelling evidence to counter societys legal documents, which reconsidered balance of equities against their appeal for interim relief hence, Appellate Court did not commit any legally noticeable error in setting aside Trial Courts interim order.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Once Petitioner failed to make required deposit within 120 days, he forfeited right to appeal and this deposit must occur at time of appeal presentation and cannot be deferred until Appellate Authority decides on any application for delay condonation.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Labour Court neglected established legal principles and natural justice, resulting in a denial of representation that could lead to a miscarriage of justice hence, impugned order is set aside.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Petitioner company did not take necessary steps to terminate services of 13 workmen nor conduct an inquiry, hence, they are entitled to monetary compensation of Rs. 7,50,000 each.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Appellate Court acted correctly by granting protective relief and stopping weakened committee from taking important decisions and its order is consistent with purpose of law and with the facts admitted by both sides.
CIVIL LAW
Details
There is no reason to entertain application for impleadment of Respondent no.2 in execution of award initiated by Petitioner against Respondent no.1 for recovery of dues.