Digi - Legal Insights
CIVIL LAW
Details
Election process must be undertaken by Respondent No. 1 within two months, even pending modification applications and Respondent No. 2 will evaluate any modification requests based on their merits.
EDUCATION
Details
Court criticizes a government resolution that restricts the timeline for submitting caste validity certificates for Scheduled Tribe candidates and such discrepancies violate the principle of equal benefits in reservation policy thus, denying admission based on technicalities is deemed unjust.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Petitioners true date of birth is 26.09.1972 and rejection of his request contradicts both regulatory mandates and established legal principles hence, impugned communications set aside directing Respondents to correct date of birth of Petitioner in service records.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Court cannot rewrite policy or compel MIDC to abandon transparent online system in favour of an ad hoc, offline seniority list which has no legal sanction.
EDUCATION
Details
Decision of Respondent No.4 rejecting Petitioners’ proposal for approval of a new D. Pharm course for academic year 2025-2026 is set aside and proposal of Petitioners shall stand remitted to Respondent No. 4 for fresh consideration.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Agreement between Model Mills and Union is not considered an industry-wide agreement under Industrial Law, as it solely pertains to that specific establishment and conditions of service have been altered by rules in accordance with Section 14 of Act.
LIMITATION
Details
Applicants failed to demonstrate an adequate justification for significant delay hence, Civil Application filed by Applicants seeking condonation of delay in filing Review Petition is devoid of any substance and same is liable to be rejected.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
There was insufficient legal connection between parties involved, as Competent Authority issued a Corrigendum that exceeded its jurisdiction, influencing land title improperly hence, impugned order issuing Corrigendum must be quashed.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Petitioners’ claim faced significant delays spanning decades without satisfactory explanation hence, no relief can be granted to Petitioners under Article 226 of Constitution.
RENT CONTROL
Details
Courts jurisdiction is limited to address clear errors and not re-evaluating evidence hence, appeal Courts decision placing landlords needs above tenants was upheld as justifiable.
TAXATION
Details
Petitioners application was not a genuine rectification application under Section 74 of Act but rather an attempt to reopen adjudicated issues through an improper forum hence, Joint Commissioner, CGST and Central Excise, has rightly observed that he is not able to rectify an order passed by Additional Commissioner.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Order passed by Respondent No.1-Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, which invalidated Petitioners claim to 'Halbi' Scheduled Tribe status, is deemed unsustainable and should be quashed.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Additional Commissioners order appeared justified and not arbitrary, supporting decision for disqualification under Section 39(1) of Act due to Petitioners complicity in her husbands actions.
RENT CONTROL
Details
Authority granted to deceased to occupy premises ceased upon his death and his heirs have not claimed tenancy rights thereafter and occupant cannot assert any rights under Will and provisions of Rent Act are inapplicable.
RENT CONTROL
Details
When Appeal Court, upon reviewing available evidence, has reached a probable finding in impugned Judgment, no interference is required in limited revisional jurisdiction of Court.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Impugned order passed by Respondent No. 2 disqualifying Petitioner as elected member and Sarpanch of Village Panchayat is erroneous and is thus quashed and set aside.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Competent Authority of SRA is directed to finalize Annexure- II in respect of slum scheme in respect of land.
EDUCATION
Details
Authorized amount will be disbursed within two weeks after determination and if Petitioner is deemed ineligible for reimbursement, reasoned decision will be issued, allowing Petitioner to seek legal remedy.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Defendants Interim Application No.3243 of 2025 is successful, concluding that Suit ought to have been filed only after obtaining permission of Charity Commissioner under Sections 50 and 51 of Act.
EDUCATION
Details
Denying admission based on technical reasons would be unjust hence, Respondent No.1 directed for creation of Supernumerary seat for admission Undergraduate Technical Course in Engineering and Technology for securing Petitioners admission.