Digi - Legal Insights

Demand and acceptance of rent by landlord will not amount to waiver of right to claim eviction on account of forfeiture of tenancy.

Transaction involved the transfer of immovable property rights and it lacked any connection to Petitioners business activities, indicating an absence of supply of service as defined by law hence, impugned Show cause notice issued by Respondent No.1 is set aside.

Impugned order quashed and remanded for Minister to reevaluate and provide concrete findings on alleged misappropriation of food grains by Respondent No. 3/DSO.

Lack of seriousness from Petitioners in contesting suit, which has been ongoing since 2018 and reasons insufficient to condone delay hence, order rejecting Petitioners' application to file written statement, proper.

No evidence showed that employees of other CPSEs perform similar work, hold similar qualifications or discharge similar responsibilities hence, decision by MOIL to maintain distinct pay structure is justified for administrative efficiency.

Legal heirs are entitled to Rs. 5,00,000 in cases of death or permanent disability without any additional considerations hence, amended Section 164 of Act is applicable retroactively, allowing for this entitlement.

Although Sale-deed was executed on 11/07/2007, sale transaction remains incomplete without registration, making document not valid title evidence.

Court criticizes a government resolution that restricts the timeline for submitting caste validity certificates for Scheduled Tribe candidates and such discrepancies violate the principle of equal benefits in reservation policy thus, denying admission based on technicalities is deemed unjust.

Agreement between Model Mills and Union is not considered an industry-wide agreement under Industrial Law, as it solely pertains to that specific establishment and conditions of service have been altered by rules in accordance with Section 14 of Act.

Order passed by Respondent No.1-Scheduled Tribe Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee, which invalidated Petitioners claim to 'Halbi' Scheduled Tribe status, is deemed unsustainable and should be quashed.

Additional Commissioners order appeared justified and not arbitrary, supporting decision for disqualification under Section 39(1) of Act due to Petitioners complicity in her husbands actions.

Denying admission based on technical reasons would be unjust hence, Respondent No.1 directed for creation of Supernumerary seat for admission Undergraduate Technical Course in Engineering and Technology for securing Petitioners admission.

If there is no adjudication on caste claim of Petitioner during his service tenure, it cannot withhold pension of employee-petitioner.

There has been no resolution passed by Respondents to create a permanent post hence, Petitioners are not entitled to permanent employment relief.

Services of Respondent-employee are terminated by way of compulsory retirement after holding enquiry against him hence, Respondent No.1 is not entitled to receive gratuity.

Impugned judgment is modified to extend that Respondent nos.1 and 2-claimants are entitled for compensation of Rs.6,92,000/- instead of Rs.5 lakh for acquisition of land, with all statutory benefits.

Pension is not a matter of charity or discretion, it is a legal right to which the employee is entitled on account of his long and dedicated service.

Legal heirs of deceased, particularly of tribal community, are entitled for equal share in suit property.

As Trial Court neglected to determine issue which is crucial and restricts sale of agricultural land to non-agriculturists, but does provide exceptions, justifying remand of matter to trial court.

Conditions imposed for granting leave should be reasonable and not create undue financial burdens, especially when a valid defense is raised.