Digi - Legal Insights

Plaintiffs conditional admission of partition deed does not establish acceptance of its terms, as no tangible actions were taken by either party to reflect its implementation hence, impugned order passed first appellate Court held proper.

Order passed by Land Acquisition, Resettlement and Rehabilitation Authority is quashed and application at Exhibit 8 is allowed, staying proceedings until final resolution of Special Civil Suit No.78 of 2022 pending before Civil Judge, Senior Division.

Married daughter of deceased employee is entitled for appointment on compassionate basis hence, impugned communication issued by respondent No.4 is quashed and Respondent shall consider application of petitioner No.1 on its own merit.

In cases where no stay or prohibitory order has been issued by any Civil Court, claims for compensation and Rehabilitation and Resettlement (R&R) benefits, including employment, will be processed after eligible landowners provide an undertaking and indemnity bond.

Clauses 4(I)(c) and (e) that exclude married daughters as dependents, except in specific cases, are considered unconstitutional and will be nullified hence, Respondent is directed to suitably amend Guidelines of 2019 and impugned order issued by respondent is quashed and set aside.

Petitioner cannot simultaneously contest acquisitions jurisdiction while having actively participated in related proceedings and his challenge to lack basis and considers it an afterthought, leading to its rejection.

Although appellant was granted interim anticipatory bail on 07/01/2025, new substantial evidence has emerged regarding incident, prompting the court to consider vacating interim order hence, impugned order passed by Special Judge is confirmed.

Impugned communications/orders issued by respondent No.3 are quashed and Respondents are directed to fix and pay petitioners pension on basis of his last drawn pay for post of Draftsman and to release all consequential retiral benefits in his favour within period of three months.

Recovery of excess salary payments to petitioner due to improper pay fixation and promotional orders, it is determined that such recovery is not permissible.

Prosecution failed to establish common intention of accused Nos. 2 and 3 however, evidence against accused No. 1, who is linked to death of deceased, is consistent and corroborated hence, appeal is partially allowed, affirming prosecutions case against accused No. 1 while exonerating accused Nos. 2 and 3.

Appellant has been in custody since 18/04/2026, that investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has already been filed hence, impugned order set aside and ail granted to Appellant.

Case establishes that victim, a child allegedly sexually assaulted by her father, faced significant trauma and violation of her rights hence, no reason to interfere with judgment impugned in Appeal even on point of quantum of sentence.

Petitioner satisfies eligibility criteria prescribed under Notification dated 16/02/2022 hence, Respondents shall consider petitioners case for promotion to post of Professor strictly in accordance with said Notification and other applicable statutory requirements, without insisting upon additional condition of five years' service as Associate Professor.

Petitioners have merely prayed rescission of contract due to non-deposit of amount within specified period, but did not claim amount was deposited without prior application or notification hence, trial Courts rejection of rescission application was justified.

Petitioner, having low vision, qualifies under a measurable disability hence, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to appoint petitioner on post of Seasonal Spraying Field Worker under reservation of Disabled Person (PH-A-Low Vision).

Respondents directed to pay petitioners retiral benefits, using an age of superannuation of 60 years and Principal of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Polytechnic must prepare and forward payment bill to relevant authority within one month, with subsequent release of pension arrears to occur within two months thereafter.

Impugned order passed by respondent no.4-Food Safety Officer directing petitioner to stop all activities, is quashed and set aside as it is passed without any authority and power.

Notification from State Government appoints the appropriate authority under Section 17(3)(b) of PCPNDT Act, indicating no need for Multi Member Committee and Authoritys search and seizure, based on document review, confirmed a "reason to believe" that justified actions taken, with no illegality involved in seizure and sealing of machines.

Despite being in jail for over two years and being acquitted in some cases, applicant has repeated offenses while on bail, indicating misuse of granted liberties hence, bail application rejected.

Trial court found no reason to overturn its acquittal of accused, emphasizing that prosecution must prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, which it failed to do hence, order of acquittal needs to be upheld.