Evidence available does not support claim that officers acted within their official duties when inflicting harm hence, orders from lower courts remain valid and case for prosecution can proceed, barring any significant evidence to contrary from accused in future proceedings.
Prosecution established accuseds intention to cause death, which led Trial Court to rightly convict accused under Section 302 of IPC.
Trial Court acted within its jurisdiction in proceeding with bidding thus, execution Case was restored and directions were given to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to conduct auctions.
Petitioner, a 21-year-old adult, has voluntarily chosen to leave her parental home and make her own life decisions hence; there is no basis for labeling Petitioner as missing or subjecting her to coercive measures for her return to Hyderabad.
Impugned order is set aside directing concerned Respondents to comply with order passed by Tribunal and make all required payments to Appellants.
Prosecution established that accused acted with intention to cause death, negating any possible exceptions in his defense thus, Trial Court has rightly considered these circumstances and rightly held accused guilty of offence punishable under Sections 302 and 201 of IPC.
Timeline for in-service teachers to obtain this qualification has been extended from two years to three years, with a new deadline set for August 31, 2028, to ensure continuity in education and mitigate risk of employment jeopardy for teachers.
Detention order issued on 10.11.2025 lacked explanation for delays and Respondents failed to justify these delays in their affidavits, leading to conclusion that significant delays in handling case violate due process and necessitate allowance of petition, as it adversely affects personal liberty of petitioner.
Central Governments earlier decision failed to consider uninterrupted delays in concluding these proceedings, warranting fresh review of appellants VRS notice.
Victims, at most 16 years old, were minors found in location of prostitution with Applicant, leading to a strong presumption of guilt under Section 6(2) of PITA, which was not rebutted as Applicant did not provide evidence or testimony hence, judgment of conviction passed by Court below, needs to be upheld.
NMMC is responsible for property tax collection in areas transferred to it, ending any exemptions previously granted to MIDC and its plot holders.
Appellant, as widow of deceased and other Appellants, are entitled to their respective pensionary benefits and arrears accordingly.
Appellant is granted necessary permission to realize Development Agreement subject to certain conditions.
State directed to conclude investigation within period of six weeks from today and file an appropriate report with JMFC containing all investigative material and if so, lack thereof.
Dependent quota aims to provide financial relief to families of deceased dealers, ensuring continuity in public distribution system hence, Competent authority shall issue necessary allotment order in favour of Appellant within period of four weeks.
High Courts decision to allow Appellant to travel to USA for medical treatment, despite adequate facilities in India, is criticized for being overly permissive hence, set aside.
It is clear that commercial quantity is involved, making consideration of twin conditions under Section 37 of NDPS Act necessary thus, High Courts failure to address these conditions renders its order granting bail unsustainable.
Appellant is entitled to compensation for 24 days of illegal custody, emphasizing that personal liberty is paramount and cannot be hindered by bureaucratic delays.
Allegations against accused-appellants appear implausible and charges do not hold under judicial scrutiny and therefore, complaint and related proceedings are to be quashed.
Although conviction was upheld, given that appellant had served over 18 years and incident occurred in 1984, his sentence was modified to time already served.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer