Digi - Legal Insights

Petitioners were daily wagers under employment of Respondent Corporation hence, their services cannot be regularized.

Advocate of High Court is appointed as Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon disputes and differences between parties arising out of and in connection with Agreement.

Petitioners husbands excess payment was never investigated or recovered during his lifetime and Respondents failed to provide evidence that recovery can be made from his legal heirs after his death.

Retired government employee is not entitled to receive gratuity until payment of penal rent.

Stand of Respondents that Petitioners illness affects the establishments efficiency and they should terminate his services, however, such a stand of Respondents cannot be countenanced as same is in teeth of provisions of Section 20 (1)(4) of Act.

Disputes involved in Suit cannot be referred to Arbitration on account of disputes relating to redemption of mortgage being incapable of resolving through arbitration on account of absence of arbitration clause.

Article 30 of Constitution grants the State the right to appoint teachers, subject to eligibility conditions, but this right cannot be diluted by State insisting on appointment by Board of Directors.

Retired government employee is not entitled to receive gratuity until payment of penal rent.

None of documents support plea of protection of possession as contemplated under Section 53-A of TP Act thus, no reason to take a different view from view expressed by Appeal Court.

Respondents single option was unjustified and violated Disabilities Act, 2016 hence, Respondent directed to recommend Petitioner against any vacant posts in selection process for visually impaired candidates.

Allegations under Sections 498A, 506 IPC found to be vague and motivated by family discord; proceedings quashed to prevent abuse of process.

FIR and charge-sheet quashed where no prima facie offence under Sections 294, 504, 506 IPC is made out and prior sanction was not obtained.

FIR under Sections 498A, 377 IPC and Dowry Act quashed where parties voluntarily settled matrimonial dispute and informant supported quashing-Exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. justified.

Application under Section 482 CrPC dismissed where applicants, despite undertaking, attempted forcible possession, justifying Magistrates direction to maintain status quo to prevent breach of peace.

Transfer to open prison rightly denied where Selection Committee found prisoner ineligible under Rules 4(II)(d) and (n); no violation of natural justice.

Detention order quashed where Detaining Authority failed to show subjective satisfaction and relied on stale offences and unverified confidential statements; no material to establish disturbance to public order.

Detention order quashed where stale offences since 2021 and absence of recent C.A. reports fail to establish disturbance to public order; identical witness statements held insufficient.

Detention order vitiated due to non-supply of medical experts opinion on C.A. reports; violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution.

Detention under MPDA Act quashed where material shows only law and order issue and lacks grounds to classify detenu as dangerous person or bootlegger.

Detention under MPDA Act set aside where material discloses only law and order issue and not disturbance to public order.