Digi - Legal Insights
CIVIL LAW
Details
Plaint cannot be rejected under clause (d) of Rule 11 of Order VII of CPC due to non-compliance with Section 12A, nor on basis of any express bar under Section 42 of Slum Act, nor under clause (a) of Rule 11 of Order VII of CPC for lack of disclosed cause of action.
ARBITRATION
Details
Appointment of unilateral arbitrator was deemed inappropriate, but Tribunals formation followed protocol and Award was not invalidated by unilateral appointment claims.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Clause 3 of Government Resolution dated 13.10.2016 is discriminatory under Article 14 of Constitution regarding Petitioners hence, it directs Zilla Parishads to grant subject teacher pay scale benefits to petitioners working as subject teachers for Classes 6 to 8 from their appointment date.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Affidavits credibility is supported by close blood relationship between Petitioner and his brother, with certificate being granted after proper inquiry and vigilance report, confirming its genuineness hence, Scrutiny Committee is directed to issue certificate of validity to Petitioner as belonging to Thakar Scheduled Tribe.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Impugned Rule 7(1)(c) of Rules, as formulated by Respondent No.2-State of Maharashtra vide Government Notification is unconstitutional and deserves to be set aside.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Assistant Registrar acted correctly in permitting amendment of bye-laws under Section 12 of Societies Registration Act and Assistant Charity Commissioner also properly accepted change report regarding this amendment.
LIMITATION
Details
Party cannot challenge an order after delay of over eight years without sufficient cause thus; delay in filing appeal is not condoned.
CIVIL LAW
Details
It is established that Petitioners mother is an Indian citizen hence, orders issued by Respondent No.2 refusing passport services in favour of Petitioner are quashed and Authorities shall process Petitioners application for issuance of passport in light of observations made in this order.
ARBITRATION
Details
Tribunal overstepped its mandate by altering its own framework and discriminated between parties, leading to decision to set aside entire Arbitral Award hence, impugned Judgment is upheld.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Respondents No.3 counter-claim should have been appropriate remedy, rather than an application under Section 446 aimed at clerical corrections hence, inventory Courts order was deemed beyond its jurisdiction and was quashed.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Petitioners are unfairly affected by prior disputes involving Wellbuild hence, Respondent Nos.01 to 04 directed to issue completion/Occupancy Certificate in respect of Tower on application/proposal in that regard made by Petitioner in accordance with law.
LIMITATION
Details
Suit is not barred by limitation, as defendants did not properly establish their period of possession of contested land.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
As Society withdrew its amendment request for conveyance, leading to conclusion that both Courts improperly granted declarations in favor of society, as primary suit was solely for declaration of title, not for specific performance and findings of both courts were deemed erroneous and invalid.
ARBITRATION
Details
Impugned Order is quashed and suit is directed to be returned to Respondent no.1, with refund of Court fees in accordance with rules and disputes between parties will be referred to arbitration, with provisions for appointing an arbitrator if necessary.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Termination of Petitioners services as a Junior Engineer due to absence of a caste validity certificate is deemed unsustainable and will be quashed directing Caste Scrutiny Committee is directed to decide caste claim of petitioner as expeditiously as possible within period of two month.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Committee failed to consider pre-independence documents that support petitioners claims and did not adequately evaluate evidence he provided hence, Committees order is deemed erroneous, leading to its quashing.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Respondents are entitled to monthly interest due to delays in possession delivery, as per Section 18(1), confirmed by Supreme Court.
EDUCATION
Details
It is imperative for authorities to implement Act effectively for its intended benefits to materialize therefore, directions are issued to ensure positive implementation of provisions of Act.
ARBITRATION
Details
Arbitral Tribunals decision to not stay Bhutan Contract is justified, as granting such an injunction could cause grave harm.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Competent Authority focused on actual dispute and no material evidence was presented to show any alteration due to misjoinder therefore, objection based on misjoinder was merely technical and insufficient to challenge authoritys substantive decision.