Digi - Legal Insights
CIVIL LAW
Details
Defendant acknowledges their relationship with Plaintiff and Court finds that trial Court cannot make decision based solely on plaintiffs pleadings hence; it is just to allow Defendant to submit a written statement.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Order of Dismissal from Service passed by Respondent No.2-Deputy Inspector General (Pers) is quashed and set aside however, liberty granted to Respondent-Department to hold de novo inquiry on Charge Article (II) and (III) if so they desire.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Non-compliance with mandatory requirement under Section 12-A of Act would not warrant rejection of plaint at the threshold.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Proposals for appointment approvals, transfers, promotions, grant-in-aid vacancies, or inclusion in Shalarth system must be decided within 60 days of submission.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Court emphasizes need for competent authority to properly evaluate documents and make a determination on matter, leading to decision for remand for reconsideration.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Petitioners, who voluntarily gave possession of 25.39 acres of land in 2000, are not entitled to claim compensation or return of their land despite their plea, as they did not contest until December 2023.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Respondent No.3-State Government lacked authority to issue notifications that specified a multiplier factor of 1.00 for land acquisition related to national highways, as this power exclusively resides with Respondent No.1-Central Government.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Alleged excess payments were made by Respondents during his service hence, recovery sought after retirement was deemed impermissible under law.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Respondent No.2 is directed to issue new order under Section 11 of MOFA to acknowledge Petitioner Societys entitlement to Deemed Conveyance for 1479.10 square metres in Navi Mumbai and to provide necessary certificates for execution and registration of conveyance.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Order lacked legal authority and violated established protocols, reflecting negligence in adhering to governmental policy, resulting in unnecessary administrative burdens and impugned order was deemed arbitrary and is subject to annulment under Article 226 of Constitution.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Executing Court has found doubts regarding existence of exceptions under Section 13 of CPC leading to thorough examination of objections and framing of issues for evidence.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Petitioners dispute is solely about salary scale and does not meet specific statutory conditions for appeal therefore, claim lacks jurisdictional basis and cannot be entertained.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Authority assessed stamp duty for each distinct transaction separately, reinforcing necessity for multiple mortgage deeds as mandated by law hence, impugned order levying deficit stamp duty of Rs 40,00,000/- along with penalty of Rs 32,00,000/-. held proper.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Licence fee is a privilege fee for legitimate production of country liquor hence, impugned order is quashed and State must refund or credit Lokranjan for any excess payments made, along with applicable interest on such refunds.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Previous School Tribunals order was deemed indefensible and set aside, granting Petitioner seniority and related benefits from specified date, with implementation required within three months.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Refusal to approve appointment from its inception cannot be sustained and Education Officers order should be modified.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Although Court acknowledges landowners' right to fair compensation and recognizes potential errors by competent authority, Petitioner has alternative legal recourse by challenging initial award hence, Court declined to exercise its jurisdiction under Article 226 of Constitution to enforce modified award, deeming it a nullity.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Delays in both petitions are within one year, Collector should have exercised his powers to condone delays, especially considering Petitioners are illiterate agriculturists unfamiliar with legal procedures thus, sufficient cause exists for Collector to act in accordance with Act.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Impugned Order from December 11, 2025, affirming seniority list dated September 11, 2024 set aside, while stipulating that one Petitioners promotion is contingent on pending Supreme Court outcomes.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Impugned order granting deemed conveyance is deemed unsustainable and should be quashed and all actions taken pursuant to said Certificate are also quashed.