Digi - Legal Insights
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention order
invalidated due to delay in approval and failure to provide vernacular
translation of key documents.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention order set
aside due to contradictory grounds and denial of fair opportunity for
representation.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention under MPDA
quashed due to contradictory stand and malafide intention of sponsoring
authority.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention under MPDA
quashed due to non-supply of bail order and lack of proper material before
detaining authority.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention set aside as
no cogent evidence existed to justify categorizing petitioner as dangerous
person; ordinary criminal law was sufficient.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention quashed as
there was no material to categorize petitioner as dangerous person or
bootlegger, and alleged acts only indicated law and order issue.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention order set
aside as solitary incident and in-camera statements failed to show disturbance
to public order warranting application of MPDA Act.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention order set
aside as absence of reference to subjective satisfaction and supporting
documents deprived petitioner of effective representation.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Detention upheld as
externment did not bar detention and live link existed between offences and
necessity of preventive action.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Quashed as authority
relied on stale offences and failed to demonstrate subjective satisfaction.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Upheld as detention
proposal, approval, and execution were timely and past offences were
sufficiently proximate.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Quashed due to
unexplained delay in proposal and issuance, indicating lack of urgency or
necessity for detention.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Tribunals decision to delay review is unjustified and stifles legitimate claim of Respondent no.1 but Court is not inclined to interfere with order in exercise of its writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Denied as petitioner
had not completed the minimum sentence required under guidelines dated
15-3-2010.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Bail rejected due to
seriousness of offence, need for custodial interrogation, and risk of tampering
with evidence.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Bail granted where
custodial interrogation not required and allegations arose from domestic
discord.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Conviction of father
reversed due to medical doubts, family context, and failure to prove guilt
beyond reasonable doubt.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Conviction set aside
due to contradictions in testimony of victim and relatives, and DNA evidence
failed to connect accused to alleged sexual assault.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Conviction under POCSO
upheld but sentence reduced considering age and surrounding factors.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Inquiry into
disproportionate assets quashed as it continued despite departments denial of consent
and procedural violation.