Conviction upheld as
prosecution proved that the accused assaulted the victim with intent to outrage
her modesty.
Show-cause notice and externment order did not adequately consider Petitioners bail conditions or provide specific threats from witnesses, rendering externment action unjustified.
Grounds of arrest
communicated within four minutes, no violation of fundamental rights.
Impugned order of detention set aside, as Petitioners detention does not fulfill legal preconditions and constitutional safeguards.
Conviction upheld as
overtaking from the left side resulted in fatalities, violating road safety
regulations.
Conviction set aside
due to weak circumstantial evidence and absence of a reliable extra-judicial
confession.
Impugned orders are not lengthy orders, but reasons assigned for rejecting proposals cannot be faulted.
Circumstantial evidence
was insufficient to sustain a conviction; death sentence reversed.
Respondent, who has served Petitioner for over 8 years and completed 240 days, is entitled to notice before retrenchment and compensation.
If qualifying service is complete, pension cannot be denied on premise that employee was working as an Untrained Teacher.
Court monitoring of an
investigation is unnecessary once trial has commenced.
Appeals in PMLA matters
should be filed on criminal side due to penal nature of proceedings.
Excess payment has been made to Petitioner for period in excess of five years before order of recovery made thus, Respondent no.4-Deputy Chief Executive Officer directed to repay amount of Rs.1,35,518/- to Petitioner.
Gross delay in action
by Drug Inspector vitiates prosecutions case.
Magistrate empowered to
issue process even against persons not named in charge-sheet if material exists.
Neither police nor
criminal court has authority to impound a passport under Sections 102 or 104 of
CrPC.
Arrest without proper
communication of grounds renders the detention illegal; bail granted.
Conviction upheld as
injuries were serious; no benefit under Probation of Offenders Act granted.
Family Court has
jurisdiction to grant maintenance under Section 20(3) of Hindu Adoptions and
Maintenance Act.
Procedural lapses,
including parallel investigations and lack of forensic examination, prejudiced
accused, warranting commutation of death sentence.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer