A High Court judgment
cannot be declared illegal under Article 32; the proper remedy is recall or
appeal under Article 136.
Resolutions issued
under executive powers must align with legislative competence and do not
violate principles of separation of powers.
Construction of
permanent structures without the landlords consent alters the property and
warrants eviction.
A tenants successor
must prove continuous residence in the tenanted premises as part of the
deceaseds family.
A transfer of shares is void if not in
the best interest of a company under liquidation.
CIDCO cannot cancel auction process in respect of Plot No. 25 even after approval of its Board resolution by State Government.
Tenancy becomes
terminable through a notice under the Transfer of Property Act once protection
under the Rent Control Act is lost.
No valid grounds to challenge Award under Section 34 of Act, as Arbitrators interpretations were deemed reasonable and consistent with established law.
Harassment of a mother
by her son and daughter-in-law nullifies compassionate claims; eviction upheld.
Pre-constitutional
records supporting a caste claim have greater probative value and should be
given due weight.
Restoration of protection under the Rent Control Act is not permissible if lost due to the entitys financial capability, as evidenced by paid-up capital and reserves.
Civil Courts cannot
entertain suits where the cause of action arises solely from apprehensions
without legal substantiation.
A company that loses
tenancy protection under the Rent Control Act cannot regain it by later
reducing its capital below the statutory limit.
Municipal corporations cannot justify illegal regularization of unauthorized construction through misleading legal references.
Orders granting trust status to a property without due procedure are invalid.
Suspension of
registration under pre-existing schemes due to electoral conduct rules is
invalid.
Applications for
recording additional evidence must demonstrate relevance and necessity to the
case at hand.
Liability primarily
rests on the individual as defined under municipal laws; excess tax must be
refunded with interest or adjusted against other dues.
Legal representatives
cannot introduce additional evidence at the final hearing unless justified
under Order XXII Rule 4(2) CPC.
A person not party to the suit or without legal representative status cannot object to execution of a decree under Section 47 CPC.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer