Given unlawful sale of society land, Court orders formation of Special Investigation Team (SIT) to investigate how land has been transferred without permission.
Pre-arrest bail procedures should be followed through competent Sessions Court rather than through writ petition, deeming High Courts actions unacceptable hence, impugned orders set aside and remitted matter for fresh consideration on merits.
Impugned judgment of High Court suspending sentence of Respondent No.2 is set aside and Respondent No. 2 is directed to surrender within ten days.
Given Appellants age and prior conduct, bail can be granted with proper conditions, as further detention is not necessary for investigation or trial purposes.
Trial Court was fully justified in recording order of conviction and sentence against Appellant, as prosecution had proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.
Allegations in complaint do not constitute a criminal offence under the invoked Sections, even if taken at face value hence, case is suitable for jurisdiction under Section 482 of CrPC to quash criminal complaint, which High Court has failed to exercise.
Court found insufficient evidence to support allegations that accused had threatened complainant with intent to cause alarm hence, impugned FIR and charge-sheet filed against them for alleged offences stand quashed.
Petitioner has served over twenty-two years, demonstrating significant time endured in custody, which supports his plea for release thus, he is entitled to benefit of premature release/remission.
Family Courts conclusions regarding cruelty and desertion are invalidated and divorce decree is upheld on basis of irretrievable breakdown, with remarks on cruelty being expunged.
In reviewing scope of judicial review in disciplinary matters, findings of impugned judgment align with established legal standards.
Dictation of draft orders by judge is not final until signed and can undergo corrections, provided they do not constitute material changes requiring further hearings.
Appeal against High Courts dismissal of revision application is based on finding that transactions fit definitions under MPID Act, thus categorizing recipients as Financial Establishment.
Trial Courts can consider preliminary objections with applications under Order VII Rule 11 and plaint admissions require verification, allowing defendants to contest even post-admission.
Appellants claim of belonging to Scheduled Tribe is dismissed due to invalidity of certificate, which lacks date and was contradicted by Tehsildars report hence, impugned proceedings stand quashed.
Assessee is entitled to seek deduction of amount of interest paid in respect of capital borrowed to tune of Rs.3,80,00,000/- for purposes of business.
Appellants conviction confirmed but ordered his release after admonition, ensuring no service disqualifications arise from conviction and imposed fines, totaling Rs.5,00,000, are earmarked for deceaseds family.
Appellant was not charged and second FIR reiterates same claims without establishing her culpability hence, impugned FIR registered of alleged offences quashed.
Bail granted to Appellant, as no cash or contraband was recovered from Appellant or his premises.
Denial of legal representatives right to challenge an award under Section 34 would undermine Arbitration Acts intent as comprehensive dispute resolution framework hence, impugned order of High Court is affirmed.
Without explicit lease provisions for eviction due to unpaid rent, no right to eviction can be presumed and thus, Respondents recourse is limited to recovering rent legally hence, impugned judgment passed by High Court is set aside.
You were logged out of this device because this account is also signed in on another device, and that device asked this one to sign out.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer