Quashing of Criminal Case - Proceedings under IPC Sections 354, 376 and POCSO Act unsustainable where continuance would jeopardize welfare of victim and child born out of wedlock; Court justified in exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.
Conviction under
Section 498A IPC set aside as allegations were vague, general, and
uncorroborated by material witnesses trial court failed to evaluate
inconsistencies.
Petition under Section
311 CrPC dismissed as petitioner had no locus to seek impleadment as witness 16
years after crime and trial had already concluded.
Issuance of process
under Section 138 NI Act upheld as Magistrate complied with Section 202 CrPC by
examining complainant and documents, despite accused residing beyond
jurisdiction.
Conviction under
Sections 120B and 411 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove appellants
knowledge or connection with fraudulent transactions and identification of
recovered property was doubtful.
Conviction upheld based
on victims consistent testimony corroborated by medical evidence; delay in FIR
not fatal.
Conviction set aside as
findings on Sections 304A and 325 IPC lacked clarity on individual role of each
accused and Section 149 IPC was improperly invoked.
Conviction confirmed as
victims testimony was consistent and supported by medical and DNA evidence.
FIR
quashed as mere failure to repay does not establish intention to deceive from
inception and no evidence of concealment of insolvency.
FIR quashed as
complainants own provocative posts invited reaction; audio evidence
cherry-picked.
Acquittal upheld as prosecution failed
to prove demand or acceptance of bribe and presumption under Section 20 of
Prevention of Corruption Act was not attracted.
Conviction upheld as
demand and acceptance were clearly proved through consistent evidence despite
non-use of anthracene powder.
Bail rejected as
multiple complaints existed against applicant and custodial interrogation was
found necessary due to serious financial fraud allegations.
Bail granted due to
prolonged incarceration and delay in trial, violating right under Article 21.
Bail granted due to
non-compliance with Rule 8 and Form 5 under NDPS Sampling Rules and absence of
proper certification.
Bail granted due to
unexplained delay in FIR, vague timeline, and lack of medical treatment prior
to complaint.
Bail granted as
allegations arose after relationship turned sour and charges lacked prima facie
support.
Bail rejected where
driver of school bus was charged with aggravated sexual assault on minor girl.Â
Granted as applicant
was in custody for over 6 years without trial concluding, violating Article 21
right to speedy trial.
Granted as undertrial
had spent over 7 years in custody without trial concluding, violating right to
speedy trial under Article 21 and justifying bail on ground of parity.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer