Digi - Legal Insights
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Appellant has been in custody since 18/04/2026, that investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has already been filed hence, impugned order set aside and ail granted to Appellant.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
As Cheque, issued after cancellation of deal, does not reflect such an obligation since transaction was terminated before any statutory notice or complaint was filed hence, cheque does not signify legally enforceable debt.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Case establishes that victim, a child allegedly sexually assaulted by her father, faced significant trauma and violation of her rights hence, no reason to interfere with judgment impugned in Appeal even on point of quantum of sentence.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
No blanket order will prevent further FIRs against Petitioner pending independent transactions and Court has not reviewed case on merits, leaving investigation conclusion and legal determinations to relevant jurisdictional Court.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Petitioners were not heard by Special Court prior to taking cognizance hence, Special Court is directed to afford Petitioners an opportunity of hearing from stage of taking cognizance.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Impugned order is quashed directing trial Court directed to rehear application seeking recall/modification of Order dated 20th January 2018, including on limitation point.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Petitioner satisfies eligibility criteria prescribed under Notification dated 16/02/2022 hence, Respondents shall consider petitioners case for promotion to post of Professor strictly in accordance with said Notification and other applicable statutory requirements, without insisting upon additional condition of five years' service as Associate Professor.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Petitioners have merely prayed rescission of contract due to non-deposit of amount within specified period, but did not claim amount was deposited without prior application or notification hence, trial Courts rejection of rescission application was justified.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Petitioner, having low vision, qualifies under a measurable disability hence, Respondent Nos.2 and 3 are directed to appoint petitioner on post of Seasonal Spraying Field Worker under reservation of Disabled Person (PH-A-Low Vision).
SERVICE LAW
Details
Respondents directed to pay petitioners retiral benefits, using an age of superannuation of 60 years and Principal of Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Polytechnic must prepare and forward payment bill to relevant authority within one month, with subsequent release of pension arrears to occur within two months thereafter.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Application for modification of original order rejected as it would entail a review, which is only permissible in cases of apparent error or new material.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Access granted to Respondents will pass through Petitioners land as per agreed Consent Terms, which are fair to both parties, including a Plan (Annexure ‘A’) detailing access.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Mere existence of inventory proceedings does not prevent maintenance of a civil suit related to proprietary rights under registered conveyances.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Petitioner has previously been granted parole five times and that misconduct incidents noted in order are uncontested hence, Petitioner is permitted to file new parole application with Respondent no.2.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
In light of Respondent-Societys lack of objection to Application for compounding and Applicants deposit of full compensation amount for an amicable settlement, Application for compounding of offence is granted.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Impugned order rejecting application under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC does not suffer from any material irregularity, illegality or error apparent on face of record.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
There are no direct allegations against Appellant in complaint, which is essential for applying Section 141 of Act that requires accused to be in charge of and responsible for companys business conduct hence, summoning order in connection with complaint registered of alleged offences, quashed.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Petitioners were incorrectly promoted over Respondents Nos. 5 to 8, who are senior and eligible for posts of Naib Tahsildar despite petitioners having worked in these posts for over three years, hence, concerned competent Authority directed to appoint respondents Nos. 5 to 8 within two weeks, warning of potential contempt proceedings for noncompliance.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Permission granted to Petitioner for diversion of 3.3561 ha. of forestland out of which 1.9656 ha. of mangrove forest land in favour of MSETCL for cutting of 847 mangroves trees within construction zone for project forming part of village Mankode, for use of non-forest purpose.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Petitioner is accused of attempting to defraud Court by obtaining a stay order through false claims hence; he must demonstrate compliance with rules to seek relief under Article 226 of Constitution, which he has not done.