Digi - Legal Insights
CIVIL LAW
Details
There is no dispute that deceased was traveling on train and that incident occurred hence, lower courts have made an error by not awarding compensation to appellant.
CIVIL LAW
Details
High Court failed to identify substantial legal questions and incorrectly set aside previous appellate courts judgment, restoring original trial courts decree in favor of plaintiff hence, impugned judgment set aside and remit matter to High Court for de novo hearing of Second Appeal after giving an opportunity to all parties concerned to put forward their case.
CRIMINAL LAW
Details
Court has resolved to issue directions to ensure effective implementation of constitutional protections under Article 21, preventing these rights from being merely illusory hence, in accordance with Articles 32 and 142 of Constitution and Article 21s mandate, Court directs Union of India, along with all States and Union Territories.
MOTOR ACCIDENT COMPENSATION
Details
Compensation awarded to appellant stands modified and enhanced accordingly with interest at same rate as awarded by High Court and Respondent no. 2-Insurance Company is directed to deposit enhanced amount before Tribunal within a period of six weeks.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Petitioners 1 to 13 are entitled to revised maximum limit for retirement-cum-death gratuity as per Government Resolution dated 1st March 2019. Kasturba Health Society must pay differential gratuity amount to these petitioners within three months of this orders communication.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Writ petition is dismissed due to non-exhaustion of alternative remedies and Petitioner retains right to approach appropriate forum, with all merits untouched for future consideration.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Impugned judgment passed by Tribunal is set aside and proceeding bearing Tenancy Revision is restored to file of Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur to decide afresh in accordance with provisions of law.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Petitioner, having received his tribe validation certificate after retirement, is entitled to service benefits that were previously withheld due to absence of this certificate.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Petition seeks resolution of private rights and significant financial relief without sanctioned plan, making its invocation of extraordinary jurisdiction inappropriate hence, no illegality in issuance of Stop Work Notice dated 18th January 2024 or in order dated 1st February 2024.
MOTOR ACCIDENT COMPENSATION
Details
Findings of Tribunal that both car driver and Loco Pilots were negligent to cause accident needs to be upheld however, Railways is held responsible for accident @ 75% and car driver is held responsible for accident @25%
CIVIL LAW
Details
Appellants do not qualify for discretionary relief of specific performance, as they failed to demonstrate both readiness and willingness and did not approach Court promptly, which disqualifies them from receiving this equitable relief.
CIVIL LAW
Details
As legal framework establishes clear jurisdictional limits, adequacy of delay explanations is irrelevant and delays in filing and re-filing appeal cannot be condoned due to inadequate justification.
MOTOR ACCIDENT COMPENSATION
Details
Award passed by MACT has been modified by High Court and interest on increased sum is to be paid as decreed by Tribunal.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Limitation period should start from High Courts order, concluding that present suit is an abuse of process and legally barred hence, impugned orders of Courts below cannot be sustained hence, set aside.
CIVIL LAW
Details
In response to ongoing dispute, court has issued several directives to address concerns raised by original writ petitioners and impugned Notification dated 17th July 2020 set aside and earlier Notification would govern field.
CIVIL LAW
Details
Compromise decree was set aside, with Court stating that partition suit should undergo full trial to appropriately adjudicate rights of all parties involved.
ARBITRATION
Details
High Court erred in its interpretation of Section 7(5) of Act by rejecting existence of arbitration agreement between parties hence, impugned order set aside and Advocate of Bombay High Court is appointed as Sole Arbitrator to resolve disputes and differences between parties.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Respondent No. 1 is entitled to compensation of Rs.2,020 per square meter for 1,394 square meters, not Rs.3,588, and will receive all consequential benefits under 2013 LA Act, with already withdrawn amounts considered in final compensation disbursement.
SERVICE LAW
Details
Appellants have remained in service due to interim orders from High Court and have completed their probation, hence, Respondents/State directed to issue requisite appointment orders.
PROPERTY LAW
Details
Appellants purchased land in 1984, but this purchase is subject to rights of occupants under Section 123 therefore, Appellants cannot claim relief as order under Section 143-C of Act does not challenge status of occupants who have transformed land for non-agricultural use.
Judgement
Reset Password
Account already active
You were logged out
You were logged out of this device because this account is also signed in on another device, and that device asked this one to sign out.