Conviction confirmed as
circumstantial evidence including last seen, recovery of stolen items, and
failure to explain disappearance formed complete chain.
Conviction upheld as
multiple eyewitnesses consistently identified accused and recovery of
blood-stained knife corroborated prosecution case.
Conviction reversed as
circumstantial evidence did not conclusively link accused to offence and failed
to form a complete chain.
Conviction set aside as
injuries were possibly accidental, eyewitness account uncorroborated, and
similarly situated accused were acquitted.
Conviction altered to
Section 304 Part II as testimony of eyewitnesses was unreliable and medical
evidence showed no intention to kill.
Conviction upheld as
accuseds premeditated act of bringing sickle and repeatedly assaulting deceased
showed clear intent to kill.
Conviction altered to
Section 302 r/w Sections 109 and 114 IPC as appellant facilitated crime but did
not directly assault the deceased.
Conviction altered to
Section 304 Part II as post-incident efforts of accused to save his wife
indicated absence of intent to kill though knowledge of consequences was
attributable.
Conviction upheld as
eye-witness testimony and medical evidence including post-mortem report
confirmed fatal head injury caused by blunt object.
Acquittal upheld as
prosecution failed to establish authenticity of documents and trial courts
findings based on evidence were reasonable.
Conviction and 20-year
minimum sentence under Section 376(3) upheld based on reliable medical and
victim evidence.
Conviction set aside as
prosecution failed to prove conscious possession and integrity of sample bottle
before chemical analysis.
Leave granted against
acquittal of one accused in cheque bounce case; rejected against others due to
insufficient material.
Writ petition dismissed
as investigation revealed accused gave two different names for bank loan and
documents confirmed involvement.
Petition dismissed as
detainee was lawfully detained and produced within stipulated time without
violation of fundamental rights.
Conviction reversed due
to unreliable DNA evidence and prosecutrix not supporting prosecution case.
Bail denied as victim
identified applicant in TIP and medical evidence corroborated allegations.
Permitted as reference
to conversation in FIR was crucial and could not be ignored merely because it
was not part of chargesheet.
Conviction of
co-accused set aside as no evidence showed they forged or aided forgery;
allegations showed at most negligence, not criminal intent.
Managers direction led
to unsafe act by worker; IPC prosecution valid even after action under
Factories Act.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer