Quashing of FIR in Amicable Settlements-Criminal
proceedings quashed as disputes were amicably settled, rendering continuation
futile.
Liability primarily rests on the individual as
defined under municipal laws; excess tax must be refunded with interest or
adjusted against other dues.
Pension entitlement-Long
service, promotions, and salary through government grant justify pension
benefits. Anjali Anand Khare Vs. State of Maharashtra
Regularization and
parity of Special APPs-Contractual appointees not entitled to regularization,
but deserve parity in honorarium and dues
Modification of posting
without reason-Transfer order issued post election without justification
rightly interfered with by Tribunal.
Delay and laches-Employment claim filed after
unreasonable delay without pursuing remedies earlier is not entertainable.
Registered title v. unregistered interest-Later
registered sale prevails over earlier unregistered equitable mortgage.
Corrigendum altering land area – Competent
Authority cannot expand conveyance area under garb of corrigendum.
Departmental enquiry initiated against employee without furnishing full documents violates principles of natural justice; order set aside.
Termination order set aside for breach of natural
justice as petitioner was not informed of proposed punishment or given chance
to respond.
Long possession without animus and proof of
adverse title does not confer ownership against State.
Employee appointed in
aided institution before 1-11-2005 entitled to Old Pension Scheme benefits.
Voluntary
undertakings by employee permit recovery of excess pensionary payments; no
interference warranted.
Transfer order
vitiated by political interference and unexplained handwritten alterations Tribunal
rightly invalidated decision.
Termination of
Anganwadi Madatnis illegal where no fraud or misrepresentation found and
documents were duly verified; reinstatement directed.
Petitioner cannot be permitted to lead additional evidence at appellate stage due to lack of due diligence during trial and he has not demonstrated any exceptional circumstances to justify introducing new evidence.
Impugned detention order needs to be upheld, as Petitioner was detained and received communication regarding grounds of detention and representation made by Petitioner was submitted after receiving notice from Advisory Board and there is no pending representation with State.
Impugned detention order set aside, as Petitioner has faced illegal detention for over a year, violating their fundamental rights to life and personal liberty.
Appellants failure to provide plausible explanation for his wifes injuries strengthened prosecutions case, which successfully established complete chain of circumstantial evidence confirming his guilt and conviction.
Criminal law should not be invoked for debt recovery and Custodial interrogation of Applicant is not needed hence, Applicant entitled to be released on bail.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer