Appellants conviction confirmed but ordered his release after admonition, ensuring no service disqualifications arise from conviction and imposed fines, totaling Rs.5,00,000, are earmarked for deceaseds family.
Appellant was not charged and second FIR reiterates same claims without establishing her culpability hence, impugned FIR registered of alleged offences quashed.
Bail granted to Appellant, as no cash or contraband was recovered from Appellant or his premises.
Denial of legal representatives right to challenge an award under Section 34 would undermine Arbitration Acts intent as comprehensive dispute resolution framework hence, impugned order of High Court is affirmed.
Without explicit lease provisions for eviction due to unpaid rent, no right to eviction can be presumed and thus, Respondents recourse is limited to recovering rent legally hence, impugned judgment passed by High Court is set aside.
Despite valiant efforts of counsel for Respondent, impugned judgments as also judgment passed by Services Tribunal stand set aside and termination of Respondent from post of Police Constable stands restored.
Issues at hand are best addressed by High-Powered Committee established in specific case hence, directions are issued for immediate participation of relevant governmental departments in Committees proceedings.
High Court erroneously issued writ of mandamus without confirming whether Governor had exercised his discretion on matter and it would have been more appropriate for High Court to request Governor to review request first.
Appellants claim, based on lack of notice regarding transfer, is unfounded as limitation period commenced on date of transfer hence, order of High Court holding that application was filed beyond prescribed period held proper.
Impugned judgment directing adherence to prior bail orders is deemed unsustainable and will be set aside however, actions taken by State authorities will remain unaffected and operational.
Impugned order of conviction is set aside due to lack of clear motive and significant discrepancies in witness accounts, which create reasonable doubt about accuseds guilt.
Case appears to be a civil dispute masquerading as criminal matter, warranting quashing of FIR hence, impugned judgment passed by High Court set aside and FIR registered of alleged offences quashed.
High Courts decision to grant bail to Respondent No. 2 was deemed unjustified due to oversight of critical evidence hence, impugned order passed by High Court is set aside. Matter is remanded back to High Court for fresh consideration.
Appellants timely application to recall order indicates proper procedure and any delays cannot be attributed to them hence, impugned judgment set aside and Special Court directed to afford opportunity of hearing to Appellant by proceeding from stage of taking cognizance.
Order issued by High Court is fundamentally flawed due to its failure to engage with prior ruling that cancelled bail of Respondent No. 2 hence, impugned order passed by High Court is set aside and bail granted to Respondent No. 2 is cancelled.
Recruitment rules did not mandate publication of candidates marks in written examination, nor was there evidence that respondents had passed it hence, impugned order, in so far as it directs Appellants to provide appointment to respondents to post of Plant Attendant, is set aside.
Respondents, who were aware of earlier grant, sought to invoke Act after statutory period had elapsed hence, given these circumstances, orders of Authorities and High Court are set aside as illegal.
High Court wrongly declined prayer for arbitration hence, impugned judgment passed by High Court set aside and former Chief Justice of Orissa High Court, is appointed as sole Arbitrator to adjudicate upon disputes between parties.
Impugned judgment of Trial Court holding Appellant guilty and awarding sentence as upheld and maintained by High Court is based on just and proper appreciation of evidence.
Evidence presented fails to conclusively establish Appellants involvement in crime hence, impugned judgment of Courts below set aside and Appellant is acquitted of charge for which he was tried and convicted.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer