Incident in question does not involve serious offense, economic crimes, or large-scale scams affecting society hence, impugned order of quashing of FIR and all consequential proceedings should not be interfered with.
Dismissal from service is justified, with no errors in law or procedure identified and Petitioners cannot claim their relationship is merely a live-in arrangement, as it is explicitly forbidden.
Section 28 imposes a statutory embargo on cognizance-taking, clarifying that Magistrate cannot do so based solely on a charge sheet.
Court distinguishes U.P. Act from similar statutes in Gujarat and Maharashtra, underscoring its deficiencies and refrains from addressing constitutional challenges raised earlier.
Proceedings under DV Act are considered an abuse of process since respondent No.1-wife voluntarily relinquished all monetary claims, including maintenance.
Review of First Information Statement (FIS) found no substantiated allegations warranting criminal culpability hence, impugned criminal proceedings shall stand quashed as against appellant.
Although numerous offenses were established against 3rd respondent, no specific allegations were directed at appellant, with prima facie charge under Sections 506 and 509 IPC mentioned against both appellant hence, no reason to permit continuance of proceedings against appellant.
Trial Courts varying outcomes convicting some and acquitting others based on same evidence were not adequately addressed by High Court, questioning consistency of their reasoning hence, impugned judgment of conviction of appellant is set aside.
Impugned order fails to meet standards of a reasoned judgment, leaving affected party unable to understand Judges reasoning hence, impugned order stands quashed and Criminal appeal remanded to roster Bench of High Court.
Petitions in accordance with Article 145(3) of Constitution and Order 38 of Supreme Court Rules may now be placed before Chief Justice of India for an appropriate order of constitution of a Constitution Bench to adjudicate constitutional validity of Sections 7, 6 and 8 of Act.
Family Court will establish visitation rights for Mother-E post-integration and non-compliance with court orders by either party will have serious consequences.
Mother, having a stable job in UK, is entitled to relocate children to avoid parental alienation and Court permits her to move with children to UK for schooling, subject to her providing an affidavit detailing schooling arrangements and an undertaking to present children as required by court.
Assessee must maintain application filed under Section 245C, while Revenue can oppose continuation based on new findings and settlement serves as a compromise, allowing Revenue to collect tax on undisclosed income while Assessee avoids penalties.
Compensation could be further enhanced based on subsequent court rulings, but successive orders in First Appeal do not create new causes of action under Section 28A.
Expert Report did not declare option B incorrect and principle of authorship was not central to assessing pairs accuracy therefore, High Court had no basis to interfere with Commissions decision.
Removal order issued on 18.03.1983 is validated because it complied with hierarchical requirements of authority hence, order of Removal of respondent passed by Adjutant is restored.
Plaint presented valid cause of action and should not be dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 hence, matter was remanded for further consideration without unregistered deed.
High Court wrongly dismissed writ petition due to alleged delay, ignoring appellants timely First Information Report on incident and subsequent traffic challans received after purported sale.
Since two groups of teachers cannot claim equivalence qua experience in rendering service as teachers, same is a valid criterion for differentiation in pay scales.
High Courts overruling of trial courts decision was seen as unjustified, lacking sufficient examination of evidence, particularly regarding loan associated with a property construction hence, Trial courts decision to dismiss suit was upheld for its reasoned analysis.
You were logged out of this device because this account is also signed in on another device, and that device asked this one to sign out.
Tap the button below to open the PDF in your device's default viewer